Silence often makes people uncomfortable. But remarkably, leaders can also use silence to generate breakthroughs in performance. Let me explore: I recently facilitated a two-day strategy retreat with 10 senior leaders of a company that had been reorganized. One objective of the retreat was to check in on the progress of the reorganization, which was designed to encourage more collaboration and decision making lower in the ranks.
I had just summarized the findings from interviews I conducted with each team member, as well as with some managers the next level down. My report to the group was not pleasant to hear, but was consistent with what just about everybody had said: The company was not benefiting from the reorganization. Most people reported that cross-functional collaboration had become more stressful, less frequent, and less successful.
Silence isn’t golden
I asked the group for their top-of-mind reactions to the report. Silence. I waited 10 heartbeats. More silence. I smiled encouragingly but people shifted their eyes away. Louder silence. A bead of sweat trickled under my shirt. Still no one spoke. Finally, to break the tension, I said, “Ah, the sound of the dead cat bounce.” This prompted some chuckles as we awkwardly moved on with some superficial commentary.
The meeting continued, but felt stilted and constrained. But it wasn’t just me. Even when others asked questions the dead cats kept bouncing. Yet at dinner that evening the group was quite convivial and open. They were a lot of fun when they let their hair down.
I didn’t sleep that night. I ruminated about what could have caused the silence, especially what I may have done to discourage open dialogue. And I worried about the day to come.
The next morning’s session was designed to help the group translate broad strategic objectives into action plans, and to create cross-departmental teams to perform the work. But I didn’t feel comfortable plunging in right away. So I asked the group how they felt about the previous day’s session, and whether there was a need to improve the group’s interaction going forward.
And what followed? Another long interval during which I only heard the faint buzzing of the overhead fluorescent lights. At that moment I couldn’t help myself. I disclosed the insomnia I experienced the night before, and said, “I don’t know how to interpret your silence,” and sat down.
Silence as a tool?
A few people said that I shouldn’t misinterpret their silence; it just meant they had nothing to contribute and didn’t want to speak gratuitously. I stayed quiet.
One person ventured that he was uncomfortable with the feedback report, and disagreed with my conclusions. Another said she felt the same way. Someone else countered that the report was spot-on but he didn’t reply because he was embarrassed. Another team member said she didn’t want to risk not being seen as a team player, so she didn’t speak up. I remained quiet.
All of a sudden there was an explosion of voices, as they began to noisily debate the virtues and problems created not by my report, but by the reorganization itself. I just kept my seat and kept my mouth closed.
Their conversation cleared up several misunderstandings. A few team members had been blaming each other for some real or imagined breach of trust. Some confessed that they had even influenced their direct reports to move away from cross-organizational projects in favor of more narrow assignments. I said little, occasionally asking others to summarize key points to ensure people were listening to each other. This all took place in less than 2 hours.
The conversation seemed to clear the way for the group to work productively on their strategic objectives, and they tackled this task with enthusiasm.
At the end of the meeting everyone reported to be enormously satisfied with the outcomes reached, and expressed renewed commitment to making the reorganization work. But I felt obligated to return to the topic of silence, and asked the group to discuss this further.
This time people chimed in that they intended to take more responsibility for their participation. They agreed to a ground rule for future meetings to assume that silence did not signal agreement, but implied disagreement. And in the face of silence the silent must ‘come clean.’ No one wanted to hear the dead cat bounce again.
Please weigh in…
Self-censored silence is just one example of a challenging team dynamic. But there are so many different types of interesting dynamics that we encounter as team members, leaders or facilitators. So we wonder, readers out there in the blogosphere: What is an example of a challenging team dynamic you’ve experienced, and what, if anything did you do about it? Please comment below, because we don’t want any dead cats bouncing on our blog!
© Dgilder | Dreamstime Stock Photos & Stock Free Images
Well Played, Rob Goldberg!
I’ve experienced the DCB. It’s the essential component to get to the real stuff. Whatever the reasons may be, the team does not solidify until the breakthrough. Silence is a powerful tool but you have to learn how to use it effectively. Although, I have not met Rob, kudos for for pushing the team. They were lucky to have you! And David, you are a great coach. Thank you for sharing what you do, Rob!
Rob,
My team has been working on developing a more healthy dynamic, by focusing in on trust and vulnerability. As you can imagine, the start of this journey was a bit challenging. As we worked to define our opportunities, using specific examples, things quickly became stale. I allowed the silence to hang in the air for a few terse minutes. The very dynamic that was a symptom of our lack of trust and willingness to be vulnerable was holding us up. As the team leader/facilitator I questioned my role in the dysfunction and quickly decided that I had better take a different tack. So, I challenged the team to come up with a list of all the things I had done that had undermined their trust. I assured them that they would not have to share the list and that I would leave the room while they worked on it.
Upon my return I then proceeded to read to them a list of all of the things I had done to undermine the trust of the team and asked them to check them off their list. There was definitely a different energy as I laid out all of the things I believe I had mishandled, and there was even a bit of humor as the team reveled in checking off the list. I then asked, “Would you like to share what I missed?” Immediately, instead of completing the list, they began talking about what situations they themselves had mishandled and the issues that were holding us up began to surface. I was relieved, as I knew we had finally begun the process of strengthening our team through candid dialogue.